Drag & finite wings
Lift is never free. The air also pushes backward, and that drag sets how much thrust you need and how far a glider travels. Drag has several distinct sources — and one of them only exists because real wings have ends.
The two-dimensional drag of a section
For a 2-D section (our solver’s world) the profile drag has two viscous pieces, since the inviscid part is zero:
- Skin-friction drag — the tangential shear of the boundary layer. For a flat plate it scales with Reynolds number as (laminar) or (turbulent). Turbulent layers rub harder.
- Form (pressure) drag — when the flow separates, the pressure no longer fully recovers at the rear, leaving a net rearward push. It grows rapidly once separation sets in near stall.
Finite wings: the price of having tips
A real wing is not infinitely long. The high pressure below and suction above leak around each tip, rolling up into two trailing tip vortices. These induce a downward velocity — a downwash — over the wing, tilting the effective oncoming flow downward.
Because lift is perpendicular to the local flow, tilting the flow down tilts the lift backward, and that rearward component is a brand-new drag that exists even with zero friction: induced drag, the unavoidable cost of making lift with a finite wing.
- aspect ratio (span² / area) — long thin wings have high AR [—]
- wingspan [m]
- span efficiency factor (≈0.7–0.95; 1 for an ideal elliptical wing) [—]
Finiteness also reduces the lift slope: the downwash means a finite wing needs a larger geometric angle for the same lift,
where is the 2-D (infinite-wing) slope from thin-aerofoil theory. As , , recovering the 2-D result our section model computes.
Lift-to-drag ratio and gliding
The single best measure of aerodynamic efficiency is the lift-to-drag ratio . It has a vivid meaning for an unpowered glider in steady descent, where the glide angle satisfies
So a wing with glides 50 m forward for every 1 m it descends. Modern sailplanes reach 50–70; an airliner cruises near 17–20; a brick is about 0.