When the Zero arrived over Pearl Harbor and then over every Allied airfield from Malaya to Darwin, nobody had a fighter that could stay with it in a turn, and nobody believed a fighter could fly the distances it flew. It could escort bombers 1,000 km to Guadalcanal and 1,000 km back, on an engine of only 950 hp. The trick was weight: no armour, no self-sealing fuel tanks, a spar of a new aluminium alloy, and an empty weight under 1,700 kg. It was superbly built and deliberately unprotected, and once Allied pilots learned to dive, shoot and leave rather than turn, its lack of protection became the thing that killed it.
533 km/hTop speed (A6M2)3,100 kmRange with tank
2· WHY IT MATTERED
Power-to-weight by subtraction
Jiro Horikoshi’s team was asked for speed, range, agility and two cannon on 950 hp, and decided it was possible only if every unnecessary gram went. The spar used Sumitomo’s Extra Super Duralumin, an aluminium-zinc alloy that the rest of the world would later call 7075. Nothing protected the pilot or the fuel. The result had a wing loading of 107 kg/m², about half a Bf 109’s, which is why it turned inside everything.
With a 330-litre drop tank and a lean, slow cruise technique its pilots were drilled in, a Zero could fly 3,100 km. Allied commanders in 1942 concluded there must be several times as many Zeros as actually existed, because they kept appearing where no fighter could possibly be.
4· WHY IT MATTERED
Beaten by tactics, then by numbers
Above about 400 km/h the Zero’s ailerons went heavy and its roll slowed. American pilots learned not to dogfight it: dive on it, fire, keep going, or pair up in the Thach weave so that whichever Zero followed one aircraft flew into the other’s guns. From 1943 the F6F Hellcat had twice the power and armour, and the Zero had lost its trained pilots.
5· THE ENGINE
The Sakae: 950 hp, air-cooled, and light
A radial engine has no radiator, no coolant and no water jackets, and the Sakae weighed about 530 kg for its 950 hp. It was never a powerful engine — the Merlin of the same year made 1,030 hp and the Sakae was overtaken by everything by 1943 — but it was reliable and it was enough, because the aircraft around it weighed so little. The later Sakae 21 added a second supercharger speed and 180 hp, at the price of range.
Nakajima Sakae 12 · 14-cylinder two-row radial · 27.9 L · single-speed supercharger · 950 hp at 4,200 m; Sakae 21 two-speed, 1,130 hp
The two 20 mm cannon in the wings hit hard — about 2.3 kg a second with the machine guns — but their drums held sixty rounds each, seven and a half seconds of firing, and their shells were slow and dropped quickly. After that the Zero was down to two rifle-calibre guns over the engine. Experienced pilots saved the cannon for a certain kill; inexperienced ones emptied them in the first pass.
7· TRY IT
The range equation, and what armour would have cost
The lab’s range tab runs the Zero through the Breguet range equation: 518 litres inside, 330 in the drop tank, a lean cruise. Then add the 100 kg of armour and the self-sealing tanks it did not have, and watch how much of the flight to Guadalcanal disappears.
Readout
Still-air range3,100 km
Radius, out and back1,550 km
Fuel on board611 kg
Fuel fraction20 %
Mitsubishi A6M Zero: Breguet with cruise L/D 13.5, scaled so that the published 3,100 km comes out with the drop tank — as the speed tab is scaled to the published speed. Still air, no reserve.
Mitsubishi A6M Zero, 5 of 10
Deep dive · Range by subtraction· opened from Mitsubishi A6M Zero
Timelines · WW2 aircraft · go deeper · Mitsubishi A6M Zero
Range by subtraction1941
Every gram left out was a kilometre gained — the Breguet equation, and a fighter built to it.
518 L·330 L·3,100 km·1,680 kg
01The idea
Fuel fraction against range: why weight taken out of the airframe went straight into the tanks
How far an aircraft can fly comes down to three things multiplied together: how efficiently its engine turns fuel into thrust, how much lift it gets for each unit of drag, and the logarithm of how much heavier it is at take-off than at landing. That last term is the fuel fraction, and it is why the Zero flew so far: with almost nothing in the airframe that did not lift or fight, an unusually large share of its weight could be petrol.
02Why it matters
The equation
Range = (η/c) × (L/D) × ln(W₀/W₁). The first term is the propeller and engine; the second is the aerodynamics; the third is the weight ratio. The Zero had a good L/D from its clean shape and low wing loading, a lean cruise technique that improved the engine term, and an empty weight of 1,680 kg that made the ratio large.
03Why it matters
What 100 kg of armour costs
Armour is weight that never burns off, so it sits in W₁ as well as W₀ and shrinks the logarithm. Self-sealing tanks are worse: their rubber lining takes up volume, so they hold less fuel as well as weighing more. Run the numbers and the Zero with Western protection could not have reached Guadalcanal from Rabaul and come back.
04Why it matters
The pilots paid the difference
The design worked exactly as intended for a year. Then Allied pilots stopped turning with it, its unprotected fuel burned when hit, and the Navy’s superbly trained pre-war pilots — the other half of the Zero’s reputation — were lost faster than they could be replaced. The later versions added armour and self-sealing tanks, and lost the range.
05Try it
Breguet, live
Add armour and self-sealing tanks to the Zero and watch the range to Guadalcanal go.
Readout
Still-air range3,100 km
Radius with a fight1,440 km
Guadalcanalin reach
Breguet with the A6M2’s fuel, L/D and cruise consumption; the fight is charged as a fixed slice of range. A planning sum, not a sortie.